Today I met a fascinating man. Well, that's deceptive. He's rather nondescript. His job sounds, and probably is, rather boring. He works with numbers, though not financially. He analyzes data, though nothing classified or secret.
He is Yeshiva University's in-house statistician.
His job is to analyze data in using advanced statistical tools (I've been in a class about advanced statistics, so I know a little more about this than I used to). Simply put, if a professor thinks students are coming from wealthier homes, he can use data from all areas of the university - admissions, finances, alumni, registrar, etc. - to find out whether this assumption is true.
The value of this is tremendous as far as YU is concerned - the more an institution knows about itself, the better it can form policy to best benefit its students and the community it serves. For example, he mentioned that he had been asked to investigate grade inflation (a frequent accusation in Jewish schools). He found that while the numbers did support the claim of higher average grades, the average SAT scores had risen as well, as had rejection rates. The conclusion? Yes, grades are higher, but the students, statistically speaking, are smarter.
This has far more powerful implications than just for Yeshiva University policy. While many people went crazy following the publication of the infamous NJPS study several years ago (where we discovered that 52% of Jews were intermarried), there were some serious problems with the statistics. Poor statistics lead to poorly analyzed results, and deceptive information. This can lead to poor policy choices - all because some researcher was eager for scary-looking numbers.
...
READ